Sparrow on a tree branch

(Photo by ลukasz Rawa)

In a nutshell

  • Scientists have discovered that birds developed complex brain circuits independently from mammals rather than inheriting them from a common ancestor, challenging long-held beliefs about brain evolution
  • While certain basic brain cells (inhibitory neurons) remained similar across species, other cells (excitatory neurons) evolved differently in birds and mammals, showing nature found multiple paths to build sophisticated brains
  • The findings suggest complex cognitive abilities can develop through various routes, potentially offering new insights into brain development and neurological treatments

LEIOA, Spain — New research is turning our understanding of brain evolution on its head. Scientists have discovered that birds developed their complex brain circuits independently from mammals, rather than inheriting them from a shared ancestor.

For years, scientists debated whether the sophisticated neural networks in bird and mammal brains originated from a common ancestor. This new study, published in Science, provides strong evidence that they evolved separately, following distinct developmental pathways.

The study, led by researchers at Spain’s Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience, reveals that birds and mammals each found their own way to build advanced brain circuits. These circuits, responsible for processing sensory information like sight and sound, perform similar functions but emerged through independent evolutionary paths over millions of years.

Our brain makes us human, but it also binds us to other animal species through a shared evolutionary history,” explains Dr. Fernando Garcรญa-Moreno, who led the research. His team studied brain development in chickens, mice, and geckos to understand how these neural circuits form during early growth stages.

The study focused on the pallium, a brain region that develops into the neocortex in mammalsโ€”the wrinkled outer layer responsible for complex thinking, sensory processing, and decision-making. Previously, scientists assumed the pallium followed similar developmental patterns in birds and mammals, just with different levels of complexity. However, this research shows that assumption was incorrect.

Using advanced technology to track brain development, the researchers discovered that nerve cells in birds form at different times and in different brain regions compared to mammals. They tracked the formation of neural circuits from their earliest stages using techniques that allowed them to see individual cells and their genetic activity.

Interestingly, when studying geckos, the team found a mixed pattern: part of the reptilian brain develops like that of mammals, while another part develops more like birds. This suggests that evolutionary pressures can lead to different solutions for building similar brain functions.

A key finding of the study involved two types of brain cells: excitatory neurons, which transmit signals, and inhibitory neurons, which regulate brain activity. While inhibitory neurons remained highly conserved across all species studied, excitatory neurons evolved in unique ways. This suggests that while some core components of brain circuitry stayed the same, others were free to diverge along separate evolutionary paths.

A complementary study from Heidelberg University further explored these findings by creating a detailed cell atlas of the avian brain. This research, also published in Science, confirmed that while birds have maintained many ancient neuron types, they also evolved unique variations. Only a few neuronal types in the avian brain showed genetic profiles similar to those found in mammals, mainly in regions like the claustrum and hippocampus, suggesting that some neurons have deep evolutionary roots shared across species.

“Our studies show that evolution has found multiple solutions for building complex brains,” explains Garcรญa-Moreno. “Birds have developed sophisticated neural circuits through their own mechanisms, without following the same path as mammals. This changes how we understand brain evolution.”

Paper Summary

Methodology

The researchers used three main approaches to track brain development. First, they marked cells at different stages of embryonic growth to see when and where new brain cells formed. Second, they used genetic tools to identify different types of brain cells and examine their development over time. Finally, they created computer models to understand how these different developmental patterns could create similar functioning circuits.

Results

The study found that birds, mammals, and reptiles develop their sensory processing circuits through different developmental sequences. While the resulting circuits perform similar functions, they arise through distinct pathways and timings during embryonic development. Inhibitory neurons showed strong conservation across species, while excitatory neurons exhibited significant variation.

Limitations

The research focused on three specific species representing broader taxonomic groups, and future studies might reveal additional variation in other species. The study primarily examined early development, and additional research could explore later developmental stages and adult circuit function.

Discussion and Takeaways

This research challenges the traditional view that similar brain circuits in different vertebrates were inherited from a common ancestor. Instead, it suggests that evolution has repeatedly found similar solutions to the challenge of processing sensory information, demonstrating both the constraints and flexibility of natural selection.

Funding and Disclosures

The research was supported by multiple institutions including the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities, the Basque Government, and various international research foundations. Two of the study authors are co-founders of Spatialist, a company focused on spatial-omics data analysis.

Publication Information

This study, titled “Evolutionary convergence of sensory circuits in the pallium of amniotes,” was published in Science (Volume 387) on February 14, 2025. The research was led by Fernando Garcรญa-Moreno and involved collaboration among multiple international institutions.

About StudyFinds Staff

StudyFinds sets out to find new research that speaks to mass audiences โ€” without all the scientific jargon. The stories we publish are digestible, summarized versions of research that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. StudyFinds Staff articles are AI assisted, but always thoroughly reviewed and edited by a Study Finds staff member. Read our AI Policy for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply