Vegan Food groceries

(Credit: New Africa/Shutterstock)

WASHINGTON — The secret to saving money at the grocery store might not be clipping coupons or buying in bulk โ€“ it could be skipping the meat aisle entirely. New research reveals the unexpected financial benefits of plant-based eating. According to scientists, following a vegan diet could save you nearly $900 per year on grocery bills compared to the popular Mediterranean diet while still delivering impressive health benefits.

The research, published in JAMA Network Open, challenges the common perception that plant-based eating is prohibitively expensive. The study found that participants who switched to a vegan diet reduced their daily food costs by about $1.80 โ€“ a 19% decrease from their regular eating habits. When compared directly to the Mediterranean diet, the vegan diet proved to be 25% less expensive, saving participants approximately $2.40 per day.

“But wait,” you might be thinking, “don’t all those fancy vegan alternatives cost more?” While meat alternatives did increase spending by about 50 cents per day, the savings from eliminating meat (nearly $3 per day), dairy (50 cents), and added fats (50 cents) more than made up for it. Even with participants spending more on vegetables (50 cents) and grains (30 cents), their overall grocery bills still dropped significantly.

Let’s put these savings in perspective: The $2.40 daily difference between vegan and Mediterranean diets adds up to $876 per year โ€“ enough to cover a month’s rent in some areas or buy a decent laptop. It’s like getting a free cup of coffee every day and then some.

The study, conducted by researchers at the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine and several universities, followed 62 participants with overweight through a carefully designed crossover trial. The average age was 57, and the group included both men (23%) and women (77%). Each participant tried both diets for 16 weeks each, with a 4-week “washout” period in between to reset their eating patterns.

The vegan diet wasn’t just any plant-based regimen โ€“ it was specifically designed as a low-fat approach focusing on fruits, vegetables, grains, and legumes. Meanwhile, the Mediterranean diet followed the well-respected PREDIMED protocol, known for its emphasis on olive oil, lean proteins, and fish. Both diets have strong track records for health benefits, but their cost implications hadn’t been directly compared before.

"Vegan" spelled out by vegetables
The $2.40 daily difference between vegan and Mediterranean diets adds up to $876 per year. (ยฉ Freepik – stock.adobe.com)

To track food costs with scientific precision, the research team used the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Thrifty Food Plan, a comprehensive database of national food prices. Participants kept detailed food diaries for three days at various points during the study (including both weekdays and weekend days), allowing researchers to calculate exact costs for their meals.

The findings paint a clear picture: while the Mediterranean diet showed no significant change in food costs (a slight increase of 60 cents per day), the vegan diet led to substantial savings. The most dramatic cuts came from eliminating meat products, with participants saving nearly $3 per day just by skipping the butcher counter. The savings on dairy products and added fats (like oils and butter) provided an additional bonus to their budgets.

One particularly interesting finding was the relative stability of Mediterranean diet costs. Despite its reputation for being an expensive eating pattern, participants’ spending didn’t change significantly when switching to this diet. This suggests that the perceived high cost of Mediterranean eating might be more myth than reality โ€“ though it still proved pricier than the vegan alternative.

โ€œAs the cost of groceries remains stubbornly high, consumers should swap the meat and dairy products for a low-fat vegan diet based on fruits, vegetables, grains, and beans to possibly save more than $650 a year on their grocery bill, compared with a standard American diet, and more than $870, compared with the Mediterranean diet,โ€ says lead author Dr. Hana Kahleova, director of clinical research at the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, in a statement. โ€œA vegan diet wonโ€™t just save money; it could save lives by helping to avoid or improve conditions like obesity, Type 2 diabetes, and heart disease.โ€

As we face rising food costs and growing health concerns, this study offers a ray of hope: eating healthier doesn’t have to break the bank. The verdict is clear: while the Mediterranean diet might give you a taste of the good life, the vegan diet might actually help you afford it. Now that’s some food for thought.

Paper Summary

Methodology

The study employed a randomized crossover design, meaning participants tried both diets in random order. They spent 16 weeks on each diet, with a 4-week break in between to eliminate any lingering effects. Participants kept detailed food diaries for three days at multiple points during the study, including two weekdays and one weekend day.

These diaries were analyzed by registered dietitians using specialized software. To calculate costs, researchers matched every food item to prices from the USDA’s Thrifty Food Plan, with two independent reviewers doing the matching to ensure accuracy. This process was overseen by a senior researcher who verified all the connections between foods and prices.

Key Results

The vegan diet led to a 19% reduction in food costs ($1.80 per day) compared to participants’ regular eating habits. When compared to the Mediterranean diet, it was 25% cheaper ($2.40 per day). The biggest savings came from eliminating meat ($2.90 per day), dairy ($0.50 per day), and added fats ($0.50 per day). While participants did spend more on vegetables ($0.50 per day), grains ($0.30 per day), and meat alternatives ($0.50 per day), the overall savings were still substantial. The Mediterranean diet didn’t significantly change food costs, showing only a slight increase of $0.60 per day.

Study Limitations

First, the study relied on self-reported food diaries, which might not capture everything participants ate. Second, the food costs were based on the Thrifty Food Plan, which tends to be conservative in its price estimates and doesn’t include alcohol.

Additionally, the study was conducted in the United States, so the findings might not apply to other countries with different food prices and availability. Finally, the participants were volunteers who chose to participate in a diet study, so they might not represent the general population’s eating habits and food choices.

Discussion & Takeaways

The study’s findings suggest that adopting a vegan diet could lead to significant food cost savings without compromising nutritional quality. The 19% reduction in food costs aligns with previous research showing similar savings. The study’s crossover design allowed for a direct comparison between vegan and Mediterranean diets, providing strong evidence for the cost differences. The findings challenge the common perception that healthy, plant-based eating is necessarily more expensive than other dietary patterns.

Funding & Disclosures

The study was funded by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. Several researchers reported receiving compensation from this organization for their work on the study. Dr. Barnard, one of the authors, serves as president of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine and Barnard Medical Center (both non-profit organizations) without compensation and receives royalties and honoraria from books, articles, and lectures related to nutrition and health. The funding organization didn’t influence the study’s design, data collection, analysis, manuscript preparation, or publication decision.

About StudyFinds Staff

StudyFinds sets out to find new research that speaks to mass audiences โ€” without all the scientific jargon. The stories we publish are digestible, summarized versions of research that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. StudyFinds Staff articles are AI assisted, but always thoroughly reviewed and edited by a Study Finds staff member. Read our AI Policy for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply