bread

(Credit: Johnny Rizk from Pexels)

BUFFALO, N.Y. — Our craving for bread, pasta, and potatoes may be more than just a cultural preference – it could be encoded in our DNA. Research reveals that our ability to digest starchy foods has much deeper roots than previously thought, potentially explaining why so many of us find carbohydrates irresistible.

Published in Science, this eye-opening research delves into the evolutionary history of a gene called AMY1, which produces salivary amylase – the enzyme that starts breaking down starches as soon as they hit our mouths. For years, scientists have known that humans carry multiple copies of this gene but pinpointing when and how these copies multiplied has been as tricky as resisting a warm, crusty baguette.

“The idea is that the more amylase genes you have, the more amylase you can produce and the more starch you can digest effectively,” says the study’s corresponding author, Omer Gokcumen, PhD, a professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University at Buffalo, in a media release.

A team of researchers from the University at Buffalo and the Jackson Laboratory decided to take a fresh bite out of this mystery. Armed with cutting-edge genomic tools like optical genome mapping and long-read sequencing, they set out to map the AMY1 gene region in a level of detail that would make a master chef proud.

The genetic feast they uncovered was more varied and complex than anyone had imagined. Among the 98 individuals studied from around the world, the team identified 52 distinct amylase haplotypes – think of these as different recipes for the AMY1 gene. Thirty of these stood out as particularly well-supported findings, suggesting that this gene region has been simmering with change throughout human history.

But the real showstopper came when the researchers peered into our evolutionary past. By examining ancient DNA from Neanderthals, Denisovans, and early modern humans, they found evidence of AMY1 gene duplications that push back the origin of our starch-digesting prowess to over 800,000 years ago. That’s long before our ancestors even dreamed of agriculture!

“This suggests that the AMY1 gene may have first duplicated more than 800,000 years ago, well before humans split from Neanderthals and much further back than previously thought,” says Kwondo Kim, one of the lead authors on this study from the Lee Lab at JAX.

picture of gene molecule strands
The AMY1 gene produces salivary amylase – the enzyme that starts breaking down starches as soon as they hit our mouths. (Photo by Warren Umoh on Unsplash)

This ancient genetic prep work didn’t go to waste. When the team analyzed 68 ancient human genomes, including one from a 45,000-year-old individual found in Siberia, they discovered that even these ancient hunter-gatherers were carrying multiple copies of the AMY1 gene. It seems our ancestors were genetically equipped for a carb-heavy diet long before they started cultivating grains.

The plot thickens like a rich risotto when we look at more recent history. Over the last 4,000 years, European farmers experienced a surge in high-copy AMY1 haplotypes. As agriculture spread, so did genetic variations allowing for even more efficient starch processing. It’s as if our genes and our growing appetite for grains were evolving in perfect harmony.

“Individuals with higher AMY1 copy numbers were likely digesting starch more efficiently and having more offspring,” Gokcumen explains. “Their lineages ultimately fared better over a long evolutionary timeframe than those with lower copy numbers, propagating the number of the AMY1 copies.”

So how did all this genetic diversification happen? The researchers identified several mechanisms, but one stands out: non-allelic homologous recombination, or NAHR. Think of it as nature’s way of accidentally duplicating recipe cards – sometimes you end up with extra copies, sometimes fewer. This genetic lottery explains why some of us hit the jackpot with extra AMY1 copies, potentially making us carb-digesting champions.

Interestingly, while the number of AMY1 copies can vary widely between individuals, the actual protein-coding sequences remain remarkably stable. It’s as if evolution is saying, “Feel free to make more copies of this recipe, but don’t change the ingredients!”

This research isn’t just food for thought about our past – it has real implications for our present and future health. Understanding how our genes have adapted to dietary changes could shed light on modern issues related to starch consumption and digestion. It might even explain why some of us find it harder to resist that second helping of mashed potatoes.

“Given the key role of AMY1 copy number variation in human evolution, this genetic variation presents an exciting opportunity to explore its impact on metabolic health and uncover the mechanisms involved in starch digestion and glucose metabolism,” says Feyza Yilmaz, an associate computational scientist at JAX and a lead author of the study. “Future research could reveal its precise effects and timing of selection, providing critical insights into genetics, nutrition, and health.”

Indeed, our genetic past continues to influence our present in ways we are only beginning to understand. As Yilmaz suggests, similar studies promise not only to shed light on human evolution but also to provide crucial insights that could help address modern health challenges related to diet and metabolism.

Paper Summary

Methodology

The researchers used a combination of advanced genomic techniques to study the amylase gene region. They started with optical genome mapping, which creates a visual map of long stretches of DNA, allowing them to identify large-scale structural variations.

This was complemented by long-read sequencing, which can read longer segments of DNA than traditional methods, providing more accurate information about complex regions. They also used computational tools to assemble these data into complete pictures of the amylase region for each individual studied. For ancient DNA analysis, they employed specialized techniques to work with degraded genetic material, using algorithms to estimate gene copy numbers from fragmentary data.

Key Results

The study identified 52 distinct amylase haplotypes, with 30 classified as high-confidence. They found evidence of AMY1 gene duplications in some Neanderthal and Denisovan genomes, suggesting an earlier origin for these variations than previously thought. Analysis of ancient European genomes showed an increase in high-copy AMY1 haplotypes over the last 4,000 years, coinciding with the spread of agriculture. The researchers also identified specific genetic mechanisms, like NAHR, that drive copy number variation in this region.

Study Limitations

While comprehensive, the study has some limitations. The sample size of 98 individuals for modern genomes, while diverse, may not capture all global variation. The ancient DNA analysis, while groundbreaking, is limited by the availability and quality of ancient samples. Additionally, the complex nature of the amylase region makes precise dating of evolutionary events challenging, and some estimates have wide confidence intervals.

Discussion & Takeaways

The study suggests that AMY1 copy number variation is an ongoing process in human evolution, potentially influenced by dietary practices. The increase in high-copy AMY1 haplotypes in post-agricultural European populations hints at possible selection pressures related to starch consumption.

However, the researchers caution against oversimplifying this relationship, noting that the interplay between genetics, diet, and health is complex. The conservation of amylase protein sequences despite structural variation suggests functional importance. The study also highlights the value of advanced genomic techniques in understanding complex genetic regions and their evolution.

Funding & Disclosures

The study was supported by various funding sources, including the National Science Foundation and the National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health. The researchers emphasized the importance of ethical considerations in genomic studies, particularly those involving ancient DNA and diverse populations.

About StudyFinds Staff

StudyFinds sets out to find new research that speaks to mass audiences — without all the scientific jargon. The stories we publish are digestible, summarized versions of research that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. StudyFinds Staff articles are AI assisted, but always thoroughly reviewed and edited by a Study Finds staff member. Read our AI Policy for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

  1. JoAnn says:

    Carbohydrates include vegetables & fruits.
    This study is only about grains.