Ancient Egyptian mummy scents

Emma Paolin, PhD researcher at University of Ljubljana (in the back) and dr. Cecilia Bembibre, lecturer at the University College London (in the front) taking swab samples for the purpose of microbiological analysis at the Krakow University of Economics. (Credit: Abdelrazek Elnaggar)

Study shows mummification process left preserved remains smelling sweet and woody

In a nutshell

  • Ancient Egyptian mummies emit surprisingly pleasant scents characterized by woody, spicy, and sweet notes, challenging common assumptions about how mummified remains might smell. These aromas come from original embalming materials, modern conservation treatments, and natural preservation processes.
  • Mummies displayed in museum cases show more complex and varied scent profiles than those in storage, suggesting that sealed display environments better preserve ancient aromatic compounds. This finding has important implications for museum conservation practices worldwide.
  • The chemical signatures of mummy scents provide valuable historical insights: similar scent profiles among Late Period mummies indicate standardized embalming practices, while unique sweet aromas in high-status mummies reveal how social class influenced mummification materials and methods.

CAIRO — Ancient Egyptian mummies don’t smell the way most people might expect. Instead of the musty odor often associated with old tombs and artifacts, many mummies give off surprisingly pleasant scents — woody, spicy, and sweet aromas that provide researchers with valuable insights into ancient burial practices and modern museum preservation.

A new study published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society has mapped out these unexpected scents through the first systematic analysis of mummy aromatics. Working with nine mummified bodies at the Egyptian Museum in Cairo, researchers discovered that these ancient remains carry distinct pleasant aromas that have persisted across millennia.

In ancient Egyptian culture, scents played a profound role in both religious and practical aspects of mummification. Pleasant aromas weren’t just about making things smell nice โ€“ they represented divine presence and spiritual purity. The ancient Egyptians used specific words to describe the spectrum of decay, from “rpw” (rot) to “hw3t” (putrefaction), and “iwtyw” (corruption). These terms appear in ancient funerary texts, highlighting how crucial it was to prevent these processes through careful preservation techniques.

A selection of the mummified bodies in the exhibition area of the Egyptian museum in Cairo.
A selection of the mummified bodies in the exhibition area of the Egyptian museum in Cairo. (Credit: Emma Paolin)

The practice of mummification evolved significantly over time. During the Predynastic period (around 5000 BCE), bodies were preserved naturally by the hot, dry desert sand. By the Old Kingdom (2700-2200 BCE), embalmers began using natron โ€“ a natural mixture of sodium carbonate and other salts โ€“ along with resins and aromatic materials. The process reached its peak of sophistication during the New Kingdom (1570-1069 BCE), when embalmers employed a complex array of fragrant substances including coniferous resins, oils from cedar and pine, precious spices, and aromatic gums like frankincense and myrrh.

Scientists examined nine mummies that showcase this evolution of preservation techniques. Five were kept in storage areas, while four were displayed in museum galleries. These mummies span different historical periods and likely represent various social classes, offering insights into how mummification practices varied based on wealth and status.

Their investigation revealed surprising differences between mummies kept in storage and those on display. Display-case mummies produced a richer variety of scents, particularly pleasant-smelling organic compounds called terpenoids, lactones, and phenolics. This difference might stem from better preservation conditions in sealed display cases, which trap and preserve ancient aromas that would otherwise dissipate.

Emma Paolin, PhD student at University of Ljubljana, setting up the devices sampling of the aromas.
Emma Paolin, PhD student at University of Ljubljana, setting up the devices sampling of the aromas. (Credit: Abdelrazek Elnaggar)

โ€œTwo aspects of this study stand out to me. First, new information was revealed by the smells, highlighting the importance of using our senses to understand the past,” said Dr. Cecilia Bembibre, from the University College London’s Bartlett School of Environment, Energy & Resources, in a statement.

โ€œSecondly, while most of the studies on mummified bodies have taken place in European museums so far, here we worked closely with Egyptian colleagues to ensure their expertise and perceptual experience were represented, and we jointly developed an ethical and respectful approach to studying the mummified bodies.โ€

Using sophisticated analysis techniques, the scientists identified four distinct sources of mummy scents. First are the original mummification materials โ€“ ancient resins, oils, and spices that still retain their aromatic properties after thousands of years. Second are plant oils used by modern conservators to help preserve the remains. Third are synthetic pesticides applied during previous conservation efforts. Finally, some scents come from natural biological processes that continue even in preserved remains.

Emma Paolin, PhD student at University of Ljubljana, setting up active air sampling with sorbent tubes and pumps.
Emma Paolin, PhD student at University of Ljubljana, setting up active air sampling with sorbent tubes and pumps. (Credit: Abdelrazek Elnaggar)

Researchers note that the synthetic pesticides they found weren’t documented in conservation records. While these chemicals pose no immediate health risks, their discovery points to the need for better documentation of preservation treatments.

One fascinating discovery emerged when researchers compared mummies from different time periods. Those from the Late Period (664-332 BCE) shared remarkably similar scent profiles, suggesting standardized embalming practices during this era. The best-preserved specimen, dating to the New Kingdom period, revealed unique sweet and fruity aromas created by chemical compounds called lactones. These special scents might indicate the deceased person’s elevated social status, as higher-quality and more expensive materials were used in their mummification.

Microbiological analysis revealed another layer of complexity. The research team identified various species of bacteria and fungi present on the mummies, including some known to contribute to the preservation process. These microorganisms produce their own volatile compounds, adding subtle notes to the overall aromatic profile while generally remaining at levels safe for both artifacts and museum visitors.

Researchers sampling  within a sarcophagus in the exhibition area of the Egyptian museum in Cairo
Emma Paolin, PhD student at University of Ljubljana, and prof. dr. Abdelrazek Elnaggar, University of Ljubljana and Ain Shams University in Egypt, sampling the within a sarcophagus in the exhibition area of the Egyptian museum in Cairo into a Nalophan bag. The bag containing this air is used for sensory analysis. (Credit: Cecilia Bembibre)

Beyond pure scientific interest, this research does provide practical applications for museum conservation. The identification of the synthetic pesticides in some specimens highlights the need for careful monitoring of preservation methods. Additionally, the study detected signs of active microbiological activity, though thankfully at levels below health and safety concerns.

“To the ancient Egyptians, mummification was an important mortuary practice aimed at preserving the body and soul for the afterlife through a detailed ritual of embalming of the deceased using oils, waxes and balms,” said study co-author, Professor Ali Abdelhalim, director of the Egyptian Museum in Cairo. “The practice evolved over time, and identifying different techniques and materials used offers insights into the era, location and socioeconomic status of the individual being mummified.”

Paper Summary

Methodology

The researchers employed a multi-pronged approach to analyze mummy scents. They began with panel-based sensory analyses, where trained observers documented scent characteristics using standardized descriptors. This was complemented by technical analysis using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-olfactometry, which separates and identifies chemical compounds while simultaneously allowing human operators to detect and describe odors. The team also conducted microbiological analysis to identify any active biological processes affecting the specimens.

Results

The study identified 13 primary olfactory descriptors, with “woody” (78% of cases), “spicy” (67%), and “sweet” (56%) being the most common. Chemical analysis revealed numerous compounds related to original mummification materials, including various terpenoids indicating the use of cedar or pine resin. Mummies on display showed a greater variety of volatile compounds than those in storage, possibly due to better preservation conditions and the accumulation of volatiles in sealed display cases.

Limitations

The research was limited by the small sample size of nine mummies and the challenges of definitively attributing chemical compounds to specific sources, as some materials used in ancient mummification share chemical signatures with modern conservation treatments. Additionally, the unknown provenance of several specimens made it difficult to draw firm conclusions about historical mummification practices across different social classes and time periods.

Discussion and Takeaways

This research provides valuable insights for museum conservation practices and our understanding of ancient Egyptian burial customs. The identification of undocumented synthetic pesticides highlights the need for better documentation of conservation treatments. The study also demonstrates the value of incorporating sensory analysis into archaeological research, offering new perspectives on how ancient Egyptians approached death and preservation.

Funding and Disclosures

The research was funded by the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency through multiple project grants, with additional support from Poland’s National Science Centre. The study involved collaboration between multiple institutions, including the University of Ljubljana, University College London, and the Egyptian Museum in Cairo.

Publication Details

This study, titled “Ancient Egyptian Mummified Bodies: Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of Their Smell,” was published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society on February 13, 2025. The research represents a collaborative effort between international institutions and combines traditional archaeological approaches with cutting-edge analytical techniques.

About StudyFinds Staff

StudyFinds sets out to find new research that speaks to mass audiences โ€” without all the scientific jargon. The stories we publish are digestible, summarized versions of research that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. StudyFinds Staff articles are AI assisted, but always thoroughly reviewed and edited by a Study Finds staff member. Read our AI Policy for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply