pedestrian on phone traffic

(Credit: itsajoop/Shutterstock)

VANCOUVER, British Columbia — Urban safety experts have long worried about the impact of distracted driving. However, a new study by University of British Columbia researchers suggests we should be equally concerned about distracted walking.

Researchers from UBC’s Department of Civil Engineering have uncovered alarming differences in behavior between pedestrians engrossed in their mobile devices and those who remain alert to their surroundings. The study, conducted at two busy intersections in Downtown Vancouver, used advanced video analysis techniques to examine the behavior of pedestrians and drivers during near-miss incidents.

Published in the journal Accident Analysis & Prevention, the findings paint a concerning picture of how our smartphone addiction is affecting our safety on city streets. Distracted pedestrians, those using their phones for texting, reading, or listening to music, tend to walk slower and maintain closer proximity to vehicles compared to their non-distracted counterparts. They also rarely yield to oncoming traffic and are less likely to change their walking direction, even when dangerously close to vehicles. This behavior suggests a significant decrease in awareness of their surroundings and reduced navigational efficiency.

In contrast, non-distracted pedestrians engaged in safer behavior. They maintained greater distances from vehicles, yielded more frequently, and adjusted their speeds according to the traffic situation. These pedestrians also demonstrated more variability in their movements, indicating a higher level of responsiveness to potential dangers.

“Non-distracted pedestrians made safer choices when interacting with vehicles,” says lead researcher Dr. Tarek Sayed, a civil engineering professor and transportation safety expert in the faculty of applied science, in a statement. “They maintained greater distances from vehicles, yielded more frequently to oncoming traffic and adjusted their speed when necessary.”

Distracted pedestrians, those using their phones for texting, reading, or listening to music, tend to walk slower and stay closer to vehicles compared to their non-distracted peers. (© Valerii Honcharuk – stock.adobe.com)

The study employed a sophisticated approach called Multi-Agent Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning (MA-AIRL) to model and analyze pedestrian-vehicle interactions. This method allowed researchers to capture the dynamics between pedestrians and drivers, treating both as intelligent agents making decisions based on their surroundings.

In simulations, interactions involving distracted pedestrians showed a 46.5% decrease in safety levels compared to those with non-distracted pedestrians. The average minimum distance between distracted pedestrians and vehicles was 30.2% less than for non-distracted pedestrians, significantly increasing the risk of collisions.

Perhaps most alarmingly, distracted pedestrians moved at speeds that were 65.7% slower than their non-distracted peers. This reduced speed, coupled with decreased awareness, creates a perfect storm for potential accidents.

The study also revealed interesting insights into driver behavior. Vehicles tended to decelerate more when approaching distracted pedestrians, suggesting that drivers recognize the potential risks associated with these individuals. However, this behavior by drivers may not always be sufficient to prevent accidents, especially in unexpected situations.

These findings have significant implications for urban planning and road safety measures. The researchers suggest that areas with high concentrations of distracted pedestrians may benefit from targeted interventions such as wider crosswalks, adjusted traffic signal timings, or the implementation of smart infrastructure to alert both pedestrians and drivers of potential dangers.

“For example, we can accommodate the risk of distracted walking and design safer infrastructure by adjusting crosswalk signal cycles or introducing audio signals to let pedestrians know when it is time to cross,” says study co-author Tala Alsharif, a graduate student in civil engineering at UBC. “City planners could also display warnings specifically for pedestrians distracted by their phones—perhaps even introduce mobile notifications that prevent pedestrians from using their phones while crossing.”

As our cities become increasingly connected and our reliance on mobile devices grows, addressing the issue of distracted walking is crucial. This study serves as a wake-up call, highlighting the need for increased awareness campaigns and potentially even policy changes to combat this modern-day hazard.

The next time you find yourself reaching for your phone while walking, remember: the digital world can wait. Your safety, and the safety of those around you, depends on staying present in the physical world.

Paper Summary

Methodology

The study utilized advanced video analysis techniques to examine pedestrian-vehicle interactions at two busy intersections in Downtown Vancouver, Canada. The researchers employed a computer vision system to extract trajectory data from video footage, including spatial and temporal information of road users. They then applied the Multi-Agent Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning (MA-AIRL) framework to model the behavior of pedestrians and vehicles as intelligent agents making decisions based on their environment.

Key Results

The study found significant differences in behavior between distracted and non-distracted pedestrians. Distracted pedestrians walked slower, maintained closer proximity to vehicles, and were less likely to yield to traffic. In simulated scenarios, interactions involving distracted pedestrians showed a 46.5% decrease in safety levels, a 30.2% decrease in minimum distance from vehicles, and speeds that were 65.7% slower compared to non-distracted pedestrians. Vehicles tended to decelerate more when approaching distracted pedestrians.

Study Limitations

The study was conducted at only two intersections in Downtown Vancouver, which may limit its generalizability to other urban environments or cultures. The researchers also note that they did not differentiate between types of distractions (e.g., visual vs. auditory) or consider factors such as pedestrian demographics or vehicle types, which could influence behavior.

Discussion & Takeaways

The findings highlight the increased risks associated with distracted walking and emphasize the need for targeted interventions in urban areas with high concentrations of distracted pedestrians. The researchers suggest that these results can inform urban planning decisions, such as implementing wider crosswalks or adjusting traffic signal timings. They also note that the study’s modeling approach could be integrated into existing traffic simulation models to more accurately represent pedestrian behavior.

Funding & Disclosures

The study was conducted by researchers from the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of British Columbia. No specific funding sources or conflicts of interest were disclosed in the paper.

About StudyFinds Staff

StudyFinds sets out to find new research that speaks to mass audiences — without all the scientific jargon. The stories we publish are digestible, summarized versions of research that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. StudyFinds Staff articles are AI assisted, but always thoroughly reviewed and edited by a Study Finds staff member. Read our AI Policy for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply